Let's Get Real About the Housing Market

This post by "The Mass. Mouth" Michael Freedberg sums up quite nicely I think what is currently going on in the housing market in North King and South Snohomish counties. Freedberg is based in Massachusetts, but his observation could be applied to anywhere that is experiencing similar market phenomena.

The Mouth's supposition is that in a changing market, the reason prices will initially be observed to rise even as time on market and number of homes being sold is shrinking is because when the market changes, only the best homes on the market will sell.

He said some other things I didn't agree with as much, but this explanation of why prices are still rising as inventory creeps up along with time on market, did make sense to me.

This is certainly what I have observed in my neck of the woods. Currently, we have more homes on the market than buyers looking to purchase. So, buyers have their pick from the cream of the crop. That just means that if a home comes on the market and is not the best one in its price range, it ain't gonna sell. It's got to compete and win in order to sell. It's really as simple as that.

Now, a couple of years ago, quality didn't matter as much because buyers so heavily outweighed sellers. I think in some places such as close-in King county we're still seeing this kind of market, though even there things have slowed a bit. But here in the outskirts (North King and South Snohomish County) what I'm seeing is pretty much what Michael describes: the best stuff sells, and the worst sits on the market until price reductions finally cause it to move or sellers take it off the market.

So then the question is, "why am I talking about this?"

Simply because--and I wish the National Association of Realtors would realize this--you can't fight market forces by pretending they don't exist. It's best to understand and accept what the market is doing, and then plan your strategy accordingly. No matter what the market may be doing, there is a winning strategy. Usually, that strategy is to do the exact OPPOSITE of what the rest of the herd is doing.

Market forces are a lot like a mob, they move on momentum. Once momentum gets going, it's got to run its course. Which it will do in time. There's no need to panic when it comes to observing market forces in operation. What I am constantly telling people is that it's okay if prices come off last year's highs--they have to if normal people are going to be able to afford a home in the future.

15% appreciation every year (or more) is not normal--not unless we all start getting 15% raises every year. Normal appreciation is a rate that outpaces inflation, but not by a lot. Back in the day when I took economics in college, we were told that 5 - 8% return on real estate was pretty good. Stocks should be in the range of 8 to 10%. However, these are rates of return over time--the way it looks in reality is typically that prices go up fast, then drop back or level off before they go up again. If they go up a lot, they can drop back a lot--or they can be stagnant.

In areas where there is a lot of in-migration such as Seattle, I would expect stagnation rather than price declines, but it depends on a variety of economic factors. If something happened to shift the supply of jobs elsewhere, then, obviously I would be more concerned. But in general our overall economy in the area is good. Therefore, people will be needing a place to live.

Given that, I would not expect to see a mass exodus out of the housing market given that the pool of rental properties has declined over the last few years (condo conversions anyone?) so renting is not really that great of an option at this time. Rents have gone up significantly along with housing prices and of course, the law of supply and demand dictates that if demand for rentals goes up and supply doesn't meet the demand, then prices for rentals will also increase.

So it's natural for markets to move up or down. The thing that is important to keep in mind, is that they usually recover. Supply and demand will eventually bring a market back to equilibrium. A healthy market is one where neither buyers nor sellers have too much power, and neither supply nor demand is too far out of whack. In fact you could say that we are recovering right now from a market where sellers had too much power, and buyers didn't have enough.

The only time markets don't recover, is when the need for the thing that is being bought and sold goes away. I don't think the day will ever come when people won't need a roof over their head.

No matter what happens, I believe that home ownership will always be an important goal for most people. And like Scarlett OHara, I believe that a piece of land is the most important thing you can own, because it gives you roots. As the child of a life-long renter, owning my own home is an incredibly significant achievement to me. It represents stability, faith in myself, and faith in the future.

I also believe that it's a sound financial move for most people, most of the time.

Seattle Makes another Top 10 List

Seattle made another top 10 list this week. Unfortunately, it was the Forbes list of Top 10 Least Affordable Cities. According to the Forbes article,

"A lot of it has to do with regulations and zoning," says Robert Bruegmann,
a history and urban planning professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
"The higher cost of doing business--and the uncertainly of business--in places
like California drives up home prices. The cost of building isn't that different
in Houston versus Los Angeles, yet L.A. prices are so much higher. ... One of
the few variables you can look at is regulatory burden."

...Unaffordability is also relative. Few residents of Sacramento,
Calif., and Seattle can afford homes in the areas, but property there is still reasonable by regional standards. Both cities are experiencing strong growth and immigration patterns, in large part due to the fact that they're less costly than West Coast cities like San Francisco, San Diego or Los Angeles...

Forbes' criteria for unaffordability is what percentage homes recently sold would be affordable to a family earning the median family income. Here's how Seattle stacked up:

Median household income: $67,870
Recent affordable home sales: 22.6%
Price-to-income affordability: Eighth worst

The news is not all doom and gloom however, as Seattle also recently made Forbes' list of Best Cities for Young Professionals, ranking 7th, based on ability to attract and retain graduates from top universities nationwide. Our strong hiring market and relatively low cost of living as compared to other similar cities (think New York, LA and San Francisco) still make this area one of the best choices for career-oriented young people.

The best take-away from this is that if you are considering a move to the Seattle area, your best course of action is to take housing prices into account when negotiating your salary. For those moving here from San Francisco and other areas in California, housing prices here will probably seem refreshingly low, but if you're moving here from the Midwest or Mountain States, plan to spend at least 10% more of your annual income on housing, and negotiate for salary accordingly.

North Sound Round Up, Part Two

Mukilteo's mayor got a raise, but the pay is still less than the mayors of other nearby cities of similar size, and by my estimation, he is also paid less than the salary of a good administrative assistant. Now, I don't purport to be an expert, but I am thinking the job of mayor is more complex, by far, than what your average administrative assistant would be expected to handle.

Part of the issue with bringing the pay scale for the position of Mukilteo's mayor in line with what a mayor of a city this size would be expected to earn, is the question of whether or not the job should be a full time one or not.

According to Mayor Joe Marine, the job is effectively a full time one whether it's paid as such or not. Others in the community feel that the mayor's job should remain a part time position. When Marine was elected, the position was understood to be a part-time one so some people feel that when Marine chose to run for the office, he should have been prepared to do what he was elected to do based on the pay scale as offered.

I think there is probably some merit to that argument, but on the other hand, I think this is part of a larger problem that the city of Mukilteo seems to have with adapting to change. It seems to me that what once worked for Mukilteo as a small town, can't be expected to work as the city continues to grow. The last 20 or so years has transformed what was once a sleepy little town into now a fairly large suburb. And I would expect that the growth will continue with the healthy economy that we enjoy. So, pretending that we are still a town too small to need infrastructure, to need planning, and to need full time employees to help manage the growth that we are experiencing, seems rather short sighted to me.

Now that I've thrown my hat into the ring on THAT little argument...

Across Puget Sound from Mukilteo, the Clinton ferry terminal on Whidbey Island has been renamed for late Washington Senator Jack Metcalf. I had the good fortune in my life to be acquainted with Mr. Metcalf growing up on Whidbey Island. He was a good man--had a farm not far from our home in Langley and I have fond memories of going to his farm to buy fresh, unpasteurized milk. I also experienced electric fencing for the first time on his farm! He was described by the Seattle Times as "having a reputation for independence and quirkiness." Sounds like a Whidbey Islander to me!

Finally, a real estate tidbit from the Zillow Blog. Today's post called, "Selling or Buying, Better Check that Calendar!" talks about the best time to list or buy a home. No, they are not talking about which month of the year is the hottest buyer's or seller's market. The topic is what day of the week, is the best time to list or make an offer.

Best time to list? Thursday morning. List any earlier in the week and your listing is stale by the weekend. Wait any longer, and you could miss some of the buyers that are searching for homes to tour that weekend. Thursday also gets you on the hotsheet for the buyer's agents that are planning tours for their clients.

Best time to buy? The first Tuesday morning of any month. Why? Because sellers will have just paid their mortgage on the first of the month (ouch!) and by Tuesday they will have given up on receiving any other offers based on the previous weekend's showings.

I think these are interesting thoughts, but there are a couple of other things that clients need to consider. For instance, when listing your home in my area, a Thursday listing will eliminate the possibility of getting your home seen on our Broker's Open, since those occur on Thursday. And in my office, our office tour is Wednesday, so a Thursday listing would mean that clients wouldn't be able to be on tour until the following week.

Downtown & North Everett Market Stats - June

Downtown and North Everett are a couple of my favorite areas to work and play, so I like to keep abreast of what is going on in that market. So I have decided to start publishing market statistics for the central Everett area (which includes Bayside, Riverside, the Business District, Stadium, Rucker Hill and Forest Park) here on my blog. If you would like a breakdown of a specific neighborhood let me know and I will be happy to provide that for you.

All statistics are hand calculated by me, using NWMLS data, and include the period June 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007

Active Listings
Listing Count: 104 (this includes ALL active listings through June 30, regardless of date listed)
Average Time on Market: 76 days
Median List Price: $298,450
Average $ Per Square Foot: $212 (range: $111 to $475)

Under Contract (includes Contingent, Active STI and Pending)
Listing Count: 53
Average Time On Market: 50 Days
Median List Price: $272,500
Average $ Square Foot: $252

Sold Listings
Listing Count: 40
Average Time On Market: 50 Days
Median Sale Price: $323,445
Average $ Square Foot: $193 (range: $110 to $364)

Interestingly, times on market are longest in the $300,000 to $500,000 price range, at 87 days. Five out of 39 properties in this price range have been on the market longer than 200 days. One property in this price range was originally priced at $1.8 million and was recently dropped into this price range in May. The property in this price range that has been on the market longest has been on for 379 days (it is new construction and part of a new townhome development called BelMonte Heights in Riverside).

Average time on market is shortest in the $500,000 and up price range at 64 days. There are only 8 homes in this price range currently on the market, with the top priced home in North Everett currently listed at $2.9 million. Excluding this particular home, which has been listed for 289 days, the average time on market would only be 31 days.

What does this tell us? Demand for homes in this area is strongest in the highest price range. North Everett, particularly Rucker Hill and Bayside north of 19th, has always been an area known for its high end homes, many of which boast incredible views of Puget Sound and Port Gardner.

Other areas near Everett's downtown, such as Riverside and Stadium, boast a lot of great starter homes and rental property for which demand tends to be pretty strong.

In between however, there are fewer options, and fewer buyers looking for those homes. That price range tends to be dominated by families, for whom schools are a big concern. Many of these families choose to live in more suburban areas such as Mukilteo, Mill Creek, Silver Lake or Snohomish.

Overall, the central Everett market has about 5 weeks of inventory based on June figures, indicating a strong seller's market for homes in this area.

Note that according to the NWMLS system-generated chart below - click to see a larger version - inventory is about evenly divided between new listings (less than 30 days on market) and older listings.

Mukilteo Market Stats - June

Here are the market stats for the month of June in Mukilteo.

Sales activity was strong, with twice as many properties going under contract and closing in the month of June as were listed. However, we had a fairly large backlog of inventory coming into June, so even with the increasing sales activity, we still have a 2 month supply of inventory as of June 30.

As an aside, we calculate supply by looking at the number of listings on the market and dividing by the number of listings that went under contract or sold during a given period. Last month, we had a 2.5 month supply of inventory, which means that at the current rate of sales, it would take 2 fewer weeks to sell through the entire stock of housing inventory in Mukilteo than it would have during May. This tells us that things have in fact picked up for the summer.

I would classify this as a healthy market, if somewhat slower than last year (last year we only had about a 1 month supply of inventory). A balanced real estate market (a market that is neither a buyer's market nor a seller's market) occurs when there is about 2 to 4 months of inventory, though some would classify as a buyer's market any inventory levels of more than 6 months, and a seller's market as inventory levels of more than 6 months. Clearly, here in Mukilteo we are in a balanced market that leans towards still being a seller's market. But, with inventory levels up over the last two years, buyers definitely have more leverage than they have had in some time.

One sector of the market that plays a big role in how days on market numbers as a whole pan out is properties over $1,000,000. These properties comprise about 10% of the market in Mukilteo, and typically, we expect to see longer market times in this sector of the market. And this is what we are seeing. Currently, it is taking an average of 130 days to get properties in this price range "under contract" and it is taking an average of 139 days to get them to sell. But we have several properties in this price range which have been on the market in excess of 250 days, which has increased days on market figures for Mukilteo as a whole.

That's my analysis, here's the data. All statistics are hand calculated by me, using NWMLS data, and include Mukilteo (in city limits) ONLY for the period June 1, 2007 through June 30, 2007:

Active Listings
Listing Count: 92 (this includes ALL listings currently on the market, regardless of date listed)
Average Time on Market: 88 days
Median List Price: $622,475
Average $ Per Square Foot: $259

There were 25 new listings in the month of June

Under Contract (includes Contingent, Active STI and Pending)
Listing Count: 21
Average Time On Market: 55 Days
Median List Price: $579,900
Average $ Square Foot: $252

Sold Listings
Listing Count: 29
Average Time On Market: 123
Median Sale Price: $620,820
Average $ Square Foot: $238

This graphic shows the breakdown of time on market for properties currently listed. Last month, about 54% of our inventory was less than 30 days old. This month, we are seeing more balance between new and older listings.

Food for Thought

Here in Mukilteo one of the big questions on everyone's mind centers around the Multi-Modal Transportation Hub that is being built down on our waterfront. The idea is to tie the ferry terminal, buses and our new Sounder commuter train together in one station, thereby improving the ease of commute for residents in the area.

Jay Inslee, our state representative, discussed the issue at today's Mukilteo Chamber meeting. Rep. Inslee has been a big supporter of this transportation hub, as am I, so it was interesting to hear what he had to say about it. He also talked about his Apollo Energy Bill which is a multi-pronged approach to helping break America's dependence on fossil fuels.

As Inslee said, American dependence on fossil fuels isn't just an economic issue it's also a security issue, as it makes us susceptible to the slings and arrows of whatever happens to be going on over in the Middle East. Inslee sees transportation, energy and security as intertwined and to solve any one of them, you have to solve all three.

I'm not meaning to get all political here, the point I am trying to make is that as gas prices top $3.00 a gallon I hope we will see a better, more integrated approach to energy and transportation policy as well as sustainable living. The reality of the matter is that high housing prices and quality of living issues do mean that a large proportion of the population will choose or be forced to live a long distance from work, which is not bad in and of itself. What is bad, is having those individuals make that commute in individual vehicles, which in many cases are not fuel efficient and emit large amounts of greenhouse gases.

Later on, I was asked by one of the chamber members if I thought there was a "bubble" in the real estate market. My response was that I didn't think that what we are seeing this year is a bubble bursting, at least not here in this area. We have a good hiring market and a limited amount of land to work with, so that insulates us somewhat from any real "bursting." But what I have seen is a softening of the market at least as compared with last year.

I also told her that I thought it was a good thing too, because affordability is starting to become a real issue. The kinds of rises in home prices that we have seen in recent years cannot be sustained forever or it becomes impossible for first-time buyers or those who are not wealthy to purchase a home. Which is a little bit of a self-fulfilling thing, given that home-ownership is the best way there is to build wealth--it's kind of like how you can't get a job until you've had a job!

So, a slight softening is a good thing. If the market never does anything but go up, eventually it prices out everyone but the rich. It's better in the long run to see things return to a more "sane" and businesslike environment. Better for buyers, and ultimately better for sellers too (as sellers in their turn are also buyers!)

That's all for now...it's good to be back!