Friday, June 29, 2007

Lease Option Purchases

One of the conversations that I always find difficult in my job is when a person comes to me wanting to buy, but is unable to because of credit issues. It's frustrating because I can really sympathize with people who are in this position, but unfortunately, I can't give them a lot of good alternatives to solving the problem. The reality is that it takes time to establish a poor credit history, and it takes time to turn things around. But people are always hoping that there is some quick-fix or a secret way to improve their credit, or some way that they can buy a home without having credit history be an issue.

Keep in mind that having poor credit doesn't always mean that a person is totally irresponsible. Sometimes it does, but there are a lot of other reasons why a person can have a low credit score. So, when I am having this conversation, I don't judge and focus mainly on what to work on going forward so that the client can achieve their goal of buying a home.

One of the things that comes up with some frequency is the idea of a lease option purchase. The client may have seen TV commercials or signs up by the road saying things like "Bad or no credit? Let me help you Lease to Own."

Folks with credit issues will ask me if I think this is a good alternative for them. Unfortunately, I have the unenviable task of saying no, given what I know about these kinds of deals.

Why? Well, typically on a lease option purchase you are putting a buyer with credit problems together with a seller who has an overpriced or otherwise unmarketable property. Think about it--if the seller could unload the property today, rather than a year or two from now, why would he choose this route? And if the buyer could buy today, why would they choose go this route either?

While sometimes it can work out, more often it is a recipe for disaster.

Let's look at the seller's side first. Most sellers will only consider doing a lease option if they are unable to sell in a normal-financing transaction. And why would that happen? Because the seller did not price his property at a level where there is market demand--in other words, it's overpriced.

That's one scenario. Another involves a seller who doesn't even try to sell his property in a normally financed transaction. This is the serial lease-option seller, and he is basically hoping that your lease-option purchase falls apart. Here's why.

In a lease-option, the buyer pays an earnest money deposit just like if they were going to buy the property outright. This is usually between $5,000 and $10,000 depending on the purchase amount. This is non-refundable, as compared to the deposit amount on a normal lease, most of which is refundable.

So, the buyer hands over his earnest money, and then pays rent for a year or two while trying to clean up his credit.

If all goes well, at the end of the lease period the buyer gets a loan and buys the home. But very often, this doesn't happen. Frequently, the credit problems are bad enough or the bad credit behavior is ingrained enough, that the buyers are not able to get their credit cleaned up enough in the period of the lease to qualify for a loan they can afford. Or, perhaps the buyer discovers there is a problem with the home and decides not to buy it. If this happens, at the end of the lease the buyer may have to walk away from the transaction. That means they also walk away from their deposit.

At this point, the seller may do another lease option, and collect another deposit from another buyer.

The serial lease option seller can put his property on the market over and over again, collecting $10,000 from each buyer, in addition to rent money. The property is making him money whether the individual buyer is able to close or not.

Sellers can lose out with a lease-option too. Sometimes the buyer decides to back away from a lease-option purchase for other reasons besides credit. If the market happens to be weak at the end of the lease period, the seller may have to put the property back on the market at a lower price. But, if this is the case, at least he has the earnest money amount from the first buyer.

Now, I'm not saying that there is never a time when a lease-option couldn't be the right course of action, and I'm not saying that every one of these transactions fails. What I am saying is that both the buyer and the seller need to control their risk by having their eyes wide open about what they are getting into.

And for buyers with credit issues, the truth is that the best way to resolve those problems and be able to buy a home of your own is to find out what factors are affecting your score negatively, and resolve those issues. This approach takes time, but it is the best and safest way to go.

3 comments:

Rob Beland said...

Great post...I see a lot of investment "gurus" out there promoting their investment real estate wealth building systems and more times than not, one of the vehicles for building the wealth involves lease-option purchases and usually focuses on people with poor credit as prime targets.

Sandy said...

I know--I see the same thing too. The TV ads, the signs all over town by the side of the road. It makes me sad to see people prey on other people that way. We will be seeing more of this now that the market is tightening up, too.

Anonymous said...

I'd like to share some of my ideas with you. You can offer lease options to these buyers, matched with an investor who buys their choice of property, rents it to them to cover the debt-service, and builds in a fair profit in the simultaneous but separate option agreement.

I posted our seminar (20 minutes) on Bloodhound Blog